Difficulties with gum elastic bougie intubation in an academic emergency department.

Publication Type	Academic Article
Authors	Shah K, Kwong B, Hazan A, Batista R, Newman D, Wiener D
Journal	J Emerg Med
Volume	41
Issue	4
Pagination	429-34
Date Published	06/26/2010
ISSN	0736-4679
Keywords	Intubation, Intratracheal
Abstract	BACKGROUND: The difficulties with gum elastic bougie (GEB) use in the emergency department (ED) have never been studied prospectively. OBJECTIVES: To determine the most common difficulties associated with endotracheal intubation using a GEB in the ED. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational study of GEB practices in our two affiliated urban EDs with a 3-year residency training program and an annual census of 150,000 patients. Laryngoscopists performing a GEB-assisted intubation completed a structured data form after laryngoscopy, recording patient characteristics, grade of laryngeal view (using the modified Cormack-Lehane classification), reason for GEB use, and problems encountered. Data were analyzed using standard statistical methods and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A GEB was used for 88 patients. The overall success rate was 70/88 (79.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 71.1-88.0%). The GEB failure rate of the first laryngoscopist was 25/88 (28.4%; 95% CI 21.0-40.3%), with the two most common reasons being: inability to insert the bougie past the hypopharynx in 13 (52%; 95% CI 32.4-71.6%) and inability to pass the endotracheal tube over the bougie in six (24%; 95% CI 7.3-40.7). CONCLUSIONS: The GEB is a helpful rescue airway device, but emergency care providers should be aware that failure rates are relatively high at a teaching institution.
DOI	10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.05.005
PubMed ID	20580514